Skip to main content
Vulnerability Management

CISOs: Do You Know the Security Risks of Your Organization's Next M&A?

CISOs: Do You Know M&A Security Risks?

In 2021, the global M&A market grew at a far greater pace than observers thought possible. According to McKinsey, large deals increased by 67%, peaking at $5.9 trillion with nearly 11,000 deals, rising 37% from 2020. This year, M&As continue to grow, but certain factors make them more complex, including geopolitical issues, inflation, regulatory oversight, digital transformations, etc. 

However, you can make your M&As more secure and protect your organization from acquiring unwanted vulnerabilities and risks by working with ethical hackers. HackerOne’s recent acquisition experience, discussed below, is a perfect example of securing an M&A and minimizing inherited risk.

First, I will discuss the inherent risks associated with M&As as attack surfaces grow.

A Growing and Unprotected Attack Surface

An ever-expanding attack surface is a global concern for most organizations and complicates an M&A, especially for CISOs. The M&A prospect may have a partially unprotected attack surface, thus increasing security risk coming in the form of a gap between the attack surface they can and do protect and the attack surface (and accompanying assets) they need to defend. This gap is what many M&A prospects bring to the table. And while an M&A may have undisputed business and strategic value, CISOs must still address the security risks involved in acquiring another organization's assets and its current attack surface, fully protected or not. 

HackerOne recently released The 2022 Attack Resistance Report, where we surveyed 800+ company IT executives across American and European organizations. Our goal was to understand the impact of a rapidly changing application landscape on an organization's readiness to defend against cyberattacks. Overall, organizations reported only 63% of their entire attack surface is resistant to attack, leaving a vulnerability gap of 37%. That gap is significant, but on average, over 44% of those surveyed also stated they lack confidence in their ability to address the risks introduced by this gap. If your organization is planning an M&A, you may be acquiring a 37% vulnerability gap, which equals security risk.

M&A Diligence May Not Be Enough for CISOs

For the CISO, evaluating security is a standard part of M&A diligence, but the outcome rarely changes the core "go/no-go" decision. Furthermore, diligence is often checklist-based, supplemented by automated tooling, or both. These methods may miss identifying the vulnerabilities and flaws in an organization's security, the entire attack surface, and unprotected assets. When M&A closes, the CISO is often without an accurate assessment of the new unit's actual security. In addition, the acquirer is immediately responsible for the new unit's assets risk.

HackerOne's M&A Experience—How a Bug Bounty Eliminated Risk

At HackerOne, we recently went through an M&A and are thrilled with the recent PullRequest acquisition. PullRequest code reviewers can accelerate engineers’ development work by connecting them to instant expertise in secure code review.

PullRequest's technology builds on our history of improving application security and emphasizes developer-first solutions. PullRequest reviewers prevent bugs from reaching production by offering software testing closer to development. This helps our customers close their attack resistance gap between what they can defend and what they need to defend. 

As HackerOne's CISO, I was immediately responsible for any business risk associated with the acquisition of PullRequest. Of course, I turned to our product portfolio to help address any possible risk. We quickly brought PullRequest in scope for a bug bounty program using HackerOne Bounty.

We added PullRequest assets for the bug bounty, which notified all hackers subscribed to our program. We started seeing valid security vulnerabilities come in within the first hour. The immediate results continued. Within 48 hours, we had received 23 submissions, including a valid high severity issue. The high severity issue was a blind Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability disclosed here. This discovery—and the program's overall success—illustrate the power of the ethical hacking community. This high severity bug had been live in the product for five years. When our hackers were invited and incentivized to look, they found it within 21 hours.

Using HackerOne Bounty, we immediately addressed the security risk that came with our acquisition of PullRequest, undetected during diligence.

Conclusion

Rapid digital transformation, globalization, M&As, divestitures, restructuring, and more are just a few factors that contribute to the increased demands on security teams. Many are understaffed and lack training. Yet, it's difficult for many organizations to find the time and resources to address these issues. There has never been a greater need for hackers' immediacy, expertise, and creativity to supplement security teams and their current processes and automated tools. 

The HackerOne Attack Resistance Management Platform, now more robust with the recent acquisition of PullRequest, can help your organization eliminate M&A risk, protect an ever-expanding attack surface, and close your attack resistance gap. Contact us to learn more about achieving attack resistance with HackerOne.