Japan's Information-Technology, Promotion Agency (IPA) has a policy of collecting information from informers and, either by itself, or through JPCERT/CC, passes that information onto the relevant parties. IPA handles website vulnerabilities and JPCERT/CC handles software vulnerabilities. According to IPA, the process is in alignment with ISO/IEC 29147:2014 (which as noted with regards to the US FDA's regulations, was updated in 2018). In 2024, Japan's "Standards for Handling Vulnerability-related Information of Software Products and Others" were partially amended to enhance the coordination and communication processes among stakeholders, including finders, software developers, and website operators, thereby improving the overall management and disclosure of vulnerability-related information. 

Objective 5.9.1. Agencies implement a Vulnerability Disclosure Policy (VDP) to enable members of the public to report vulnerabilities in the agency’s public-facing systems and applications and receive feedback on such reports.  Objective 5.9.20. A VDP will typically include: A scoping statement setting out which systems the policy applies to (e.g. the agency’s website and other public-facing systems); Details of how finders can contact the agency’s security team (including any public keys for encrypting reports); Permitted activities; Acknowledgement of reports and a response time (typically 60 or 90 days) for corrections, adjustments, or other “fixes”; Reporters/finders agreeing to not share information about the vulnerability until the end of the disclosure period, to let the organisation fix the issues before it becomes public; Illegal activities are not permitted (specifying any relevant legislation, such as the Crimes Act, the Privacy Act etc.); and Either a statement that bug bounties will not be paid for any discoveries, or information about the agency’s bug bounty programme. Version 3.8 of this manual was released in September 2024. 

Control: ISM-1616; Revision: 0; Updated: Aug-20; Applicability: All; Essential Eight: N/A A vulnerability disclosure program is implemented to assist with the secure development and maintenance of products and services.  Control: ISM-1755; Revision: 1; Updated: Dec-22; Applicability: All; Essential Eight: N/A A vulnerability disclosure policy is developed, implemented and maintained.  Control: ISM-1756; Revision: 1; Updated: Dec-22; Applicability: All; Essential Eight: N/A Vulnerability disclosure processes, and supporting vulnerability disclosure procedures, are developed, implemented and maintained. Control: ISM-1717; Revision: 2; Updated: Sep-23; Applicability: All; Essential Eight: N/A A ‘security.txt’ file is hosted for all internet-facing organisational domains to assist in the responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities in an organisation’s products and services. 

2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy  All companies that provide internet-connected devices and services shall provide a public point of contact as part of a vulnerability disclosure policy in order that security researchers and others are able to report issues. Disclosed vulnerabilities should be acted on in a timely manner.

INCIBE-CERT has an established CVD (Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure) policy that supports those who wish to provide information on vulnerabilities detected, both in INCIBE-CERT's own systems and in the systems of third parties, citizens and private entities in Spain. For this reason, INCIBE-CERT provides support to those people who wish to provide information on vulnerabilities they have detected, and acts by anonymising the informant's data, unless the informant expressly indicates otherwise (at any time during the vulnerability management) or a judge so requires.

Provides recommended procedures for the reporter of a vulnerability: # Report the vulnerability to the National Cyber Security Centre SK-CERT as soon as it is detected in order to minimize the risk of abuse by the attackers. # For confidentiality, it is recommended to encrypt the communication via PGP. # The vulnerability report must include a detailed description of the problem. Suggestion of the vulnerability solution is also possible. # It is recommended to include a detailed contact information in the report, along with the means of secure communication (e. g. PGP fingerprint). # SK-CERT may assist the reporter by taking further steps: * to assess a reported vulnerability from an expert viewpoint, * to register CVE number for vulnerability, * to identify entities concerned and their respective contacts (a manufacturer, national CSIRTs, affected users), * to contact entities concerned either with the reporter identity or with the reporter anonymity. # The reporter may specify a vulnerability removal period for the affected entity during which the vulnerability is not disclosed publicly. If the entity does not respond to the report and the deadline expires, the reporter may disclose the vulnerability publicly. It is a good practice to add vulnerability solution methods or mitigation to the vulnerability report. The default period is 30 to 90 days, depending on the nature of the vulnerability  Provides recommended procedures for the affected entities of a vulnerability: * a process of vulnerability reporting (within the process each reported issue should be assessed and not just limited to the vulnerabilities with higher severity), * a process of vulnerability prioritisation and management, * a process of vulnerability disclosure to the public. # The response to each report should be prompt and adequate to the reported vulnerability. # The vulnerability management process should be given a high priority and vulnerabilities should be fixed in the next update. # The vulnerability management process should also include identifying potential victims and the method of their notification. # If the vulnerability is to be disclosed to the public, the company will determine the date of disclosure and notify the reporter if the vulnerability was not detected by the company. After consulting the reporter, it will also choose an appropriate channel for vulnerability disclosure to the community and the public. # The company may reward the reporter for reporting the vulnerability. It may also "offer a reward" for finding vulnerabilities in its products. This procedure is recommended to increase the security of the company's products and services. # Vulnerability reporting should be seen as an opportunity to improve products and a chance to learn about the vulnerability earlier than its abuse causes damage to the user, operator or manufacturer of the product or service. Therefore, it is recommended to treat the reporter gratefully as a person who wants to help as a friendly co-worker. This, of course, does not preclude legal action if the reporter's actions are manifestly unethical or illegal.

Processes are established to receive, analyze and respond to vulnerabilities disclosed to the organization from internal and external sources - The organization should have a formal process to receive the submission of vulnerabilities from internal or external sources (e.g.: internal tests, vulnerability reports, security researchers). Each submission should be analyzed, verified and follow the process for security incident handling, unless it is a false positive.

Outlines best practices for organizations to create their own CVD policy. It focuses on 5 broad areas: 1. Explaining the goal of a CVD 2. Defining the differing areas of responsibility for organizations and the party reporting a vulnerability 3. Proposing structures of a CVD within an organization, proposing terms for an individual, and proposing coordination with the NCSC 4. Clarifying the process for the communication of a vulnerability 5. Providing examples of existing CVDs